Refutation

Wa’alaikum salaam warahmatullah, Dear brother Rajeef,
Sub: Refutation See, here you are trying to bluffing me by saying (whereas your mail is nothing but your kalaam. It seems you have high regards for your self... "I have attacked the troid... I have exposed it...") Let me ask you; what about you?! How did you reach a conclusion on me as to say; your attachment "Salafism exposed" did expose to me that you favour or belong to KNM group. Do you get any message from Allah or any of your Sheike passes it to you?! Or do you think those who criticize your deviant group all are KNM?! Don’t think all people are dissipate like you.
The most unfortunate thing is that you do not have any regards to the truth as I have very clearly ‘exposed’ the deviant beliefs of troid in Aqeeda with the Qur’an and Hadith. What it means you will not believe on the mistakes they have committed until your favorite scholars expose it for you. Is it not the real Hizbiya? If not, what you mean by Hizbiya?!
Again I would repeat here, you are trying to mislead the readers with the ill gotten devilish intentions. Otherwise bring proof, which SALAFI MASHAYKHS said democracy as worshipping of the majority, democracy is a major shirk, maududi was in correct in Aqeeda etc (I said nothing from myself I just quoted the SALAFI MASHAYKHS.) and also you have to tell me what is wrong with my kalaam if it is not contradict with Qur’an and Sunna?!!
Most of the Muslims have some misconception about Bidha. Those who are blabby about Hizbiya, Sunna, and Bidha etc are seemed to be encircled with this unfortunate scenario profoundly. They misinterpreted everything which was not existed during the time of ‘people of the best of nation, as Bid’ah but the same time certain aspects are conveniently overlooking without such a considerations.
Definition of bid’ah.
Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “According to sharee’ah, the definition is ‘Worshipping Allaah in ways that Allaah has not prescribed.’ If you wish you may say, ‘Worshipping Allaah in ways that are not those of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his rightly guided successors (al-khulafaa’ al-raashidoon).’”
The first definition is taken from the aayah (interpretation of the meaning):
“Or have they partners with Allaah (false gods) who have instituted for them a religion which Allaah has not ordained?” [al-Shooraa 42:21]
So everyone who worships Allaah in a manner that Allaah has not prescribed or in a manner that is not in accordance with the way of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or his rightly-guided successors (al-khulafa’ al-raashidoon), is an innovator, whether that innovated worship has to do with the names and attributes of Allaah, or to do with His rulings and laws.
With regard to ordinary matters of habit and custom, these are not called bid’ah (innovation) in Islam, even though they may be described as such in linguistic terms. But they are not innovations in the religious sense, and these are not the things that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was warning us against.
(Majmoo’ Fataawa Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, vol. 2, p. 291)Dear brother Rajeef, now you have to tell me, how could you consider democracy as a bid’ah?! Do you think it is a matter of Deen? Like an Ibaadha? Have you not considering Sheikh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen as a great scholar since I didn’t see his name in your MASHEIKE list?! He has vey clearly stated what is Bid’ah in Islam. Let me ask you some pertinent questions for your clarifications. If you didn’t surrender your brain to anybody please try to reply.
1. It is irreverent to discuss about the merits and demerits of democracy here since as I made it clear before, all pious and God fearing Muslims all over the world unanimously believe that Islam is the only solution for every problems of the world and alike, Islamic law and jurisprudence as a governing system for Muslims. But beyond this subject there are important issues to be considered like what is Shirk in Islam similarly what Bid’ah in Islam is? Does the democracy, Secularism, Monarchy etc could be considered a Bid’ah or Shirk? If the answer is yes, as the so called anti Hizbi group claims, what is the proof for that from the Qur’an and Sunna?
2. Maulan Maududi had developed certain terminologies like Deen means state, Ilaah means Ruler of the state, Ibaadha means obedience to the ruler etc to declare democracy and secularism is a system of Taghoot and Shirk. But so far we Muslims could not understand why these so called anti Hizbiya group, your group, calling democracy is a Shirk, Bid’ah etc. I have read somewhere Maududi was one of renowned scholar for gulf salafees (?) and he was awarded with king Faizal award too. More over him was one of founder members of Madeena University. Dear Rajeef even it is not a matter of our discussion however for your information do you know who were exposed Maududi’s Aqeeda to the Salafi Scholars? (earnestly not by me)
Why it is only democracy?!! Is monarchy or kingdom from Islam? Please bring some of the fatwa of scholars on the same before going to declare Muslims live in democratic states as Bid’ahees. Recently there was news in Gulf Madhyamam about the fatwa of grand Mufti and others as ordering Muslims all over the world that lives in un-Islamic countries, to participate in election, voting etc. if it is true, they strictly supporting instead of discouraging Muslims from cooperating with un-Islamic state. 3. Can you bring any single proof from any MASHEIKS, who used to give naseeha to the Indian Muslims and others, as saying about the leaders and scholars of Ahle Hadhess and as well as Salfees in Kerala were supporting and fighting against the British rule for establish a system of Bid’ah in Islam.
My clarifications for your questionsI think so far you didn’t understand what Salafi Manhaj is. We Muslims believe that if something very clear from Qur’an and Sunna that is sufficient for a Muslim to understand Islam Deen. We look into the ‘people of best of nation’ to know about their methodology that they used to interpret and understand Qur’an and Sunna. Nowhere either in Qur’an or Sunna said that Muslims all over the world must follow such and such scholars ‘blindly and unconditionally’. Islam has given stringent certain preconditions for every pious and God fearing Muslims while acquiring knowledge from even any ‘big scholars’ as beloved prophet salallahu wa alyi wasalam said obedience only in goodness not in falseness/ evil.
We Muslims believe that there was only one maasoom/infallible i.e. non other than prophet salallahu wa alayi wasalam. Whoever it may be, whether it is x or y or sheik or Masheike, they are not free from mistakes/sin. By keeping all respect to the scholars, if their sayings/actions are found to be contradicted with the Qur’an or Sunna, Muslims who love Allah and His Deen will reject it and accept the truth.
It is not mandatory for Muslims to obey any scholar or even our beloved parents or children if their opinion, views etc are against Qur’an and Sunna. Instead of looking to scholar’s opinion Muslims have to see what Qur’an and Sunna says. But in contrary to the fact Muslims have been blindly following the opinions of Scholars. This is one of the main reasons for the existing Madhabi system among contemporary Muslims. They will accept only the views of their Sheiks but the same time their sheiks are not free from mistakes or infallible. So that, by accepting the views of the sheik in blindly they will adopt their mistakes also in their life. Its consequences may differ depend upon the seriousness of the mistakes of the Sheiks/ scholars (as you seen in Troid). Because of this reason Salafi movement in all over the world urge Muslims to go back to Qur’an and Sunna. Those who want to follow the manhaj of salaf they have to see first what the Qur’an and Sunna said and how did our pious predecessors understand that. Those who follow this methodology/ manhaj to understand Qur’an and Sunna can be called a Salafi. It is not a group of particular people gathered together in a place but you might see them every corner of the world. They could be identified by their methodology in understanding and interpreting Qur’an and Sunna as our pious predecessors had done.
I hope you have presumed the answer regarding the question on scholars. I hereby attach my previous reply to your group member as titled ‘Muslims, Democracy and Manhaju salaf’. Instead of asking which scholar said it, ask in which chapter, verse said it and in which hadith it’s mentioned and did Sahaba understood the same etc. if my views are against any Ahlu Sunna wa jamaah scholars then bring it into my notice. You are most welcome to point out my mistakes, with a great enthusiasm I would correct it Insha’Allah.
May Allah save the Muslim community from every sort of partisanship to any Scholar, organization and strengthen us with useful knowledge.
Mammedutty Nilambur

Maududian salafi and the true Salafi

Assalamu alaikum warahmatullah,
Sub: Maududian salafi and the true Salafi
It is very much relevant to remember the saying of prophet salallahu alaihiwasalam now; obedience is only in goodness not in falseness.
It is not mandatory for a Muslim to obey any scholar or even our beloved parents or children if their opinion, views etc are against Qur’an and Sunna. Instead of looking to scholar’s opinion Muslims have to see what Qur’an and Sunna says. But in contrary to the fact Muslims have been blindly following the opinions of Scholars. This is one of the main reasons for the existing madhabi system among contemporary Muslims. They will accept only the views of their Sheiks but the same time their sheiks are not free from mistakes or infallible. So that, by accepting the views of the sheik in blindly they will adopt their mistakes also in their life. Its consequences may differ depend upon the seriousness of the mistakes of the Sheiks/ scholars. Because of this reason Salafi movement in all over the world urge Muslims to go back to Qur’an and Sunna. Those who want to follow the manhaj of salaf they have to see first what the Qur’an and Sunna said and how did our pious predecessors understand that. Those who follow this methodology/ manhaj to understand Qur’an and Sunna can be called a Salafi. It is not a group of particular people gathered together in a place but you might see them every corner of the world. They could be identified by their methodology in understanding and interpreting Qur’an and Sunna as our pious predecessors had done.
Again I have to object you strongly on your remarks made about maududi as you said ''Maududi was correct in saying that elections/democracy is not from the deen, but was not correct in applying it in the lands here''. By saying these words you are completely admitting Maududi’s Aqeeda on election and democracy but disagree with him in its application. It means still you are considering democracy as a Shirk based on the Ayat 40 from Surat Yusuf.
You have severely misunderstood about Maududi’s Islam. Maududi has said that it is an obligatory for Muslim to establish Islamic state by removing un-Islamic state. For this, he has changed even the pure concept of basic terms in Quran like Ebaada, Elaah, Rabb, Deen etc. According to him Deen means State, Sharia means Constitution of the state, Ilaah means ruler of the state, Ibaada means obedience to the ruler. He claims that if a Muslim obeys the ruler of a un- Islamic government it is an Ibaada to that ruler. By doing so, he is associating partner to Allah and hence, became Mushriq and Kaffir (From Four Basic Quranic Terms, Malayalam edition). He also said that prayer, fasting, Zakkah, Hajj etc are training Muslims to establish a state. He formed a 'new way of life', a politically oriented ideology in the name of Islam.
Neither prophet (peace be upon him) nor people of the best of the nation did not say that Deen is state as Maududi said. Instead of using socialist state, democratic state, Maududi has used Socialist Deen, democratic Deen, Raja deen (autocracy) etc and he added that "every deen required its own power to exist, Deen without power is just like someone staying in an imaginary home, Islam cannot exist in a not ruling Islamic state, so it is the duty of every Muslim to establish Islamic state by removing un-Islamic Govt" for more information read Maududi's Qutbaat page 295 to 298. He had declared that changing the power from British to Indian would be similar to changing the Laatha to Manatha (two deities of Jahiliya Makka). By doing so he compared it with idol worshipping.
I really feel pity on you now. Your enmity towards KNM has trapped you in such great blunder and difficult situation. My dear brother you have still time to correct your aqeeta. Do you know how was Maududi elected as the first Ameer/ president for Jamaat e Islami Hind? It was after the election in the first meeting which held at Pathankot in Punjab in 1942. If you would say again Maududi was correct in saying that elections/ democracy is not from Deen, I would like to remind you about our everlasting destiny in the life after death. Correct yourself. The source you have chosen to learn Islam is really deserved to be in danger. Let me quote the saying of our beloved prophet (peace be upon him); whoever sought guidance from books other than the Quran, Allah will lead him astray (At-Tirmidhi 2906).
Maududi claimed that he was the only person who could understand the meaning of Elaah, Rabb, Ebatha, and Deen and it was hidden among the Muslims up to him after the first century. MahadaAllah! (Quran ki Chaar Bunyaadi Istilaahen page No.14, Malayalam edition). There are lot of Islamic scholars were passed away from the first century to Maududi but he dared to say that the actual meaning of these four terms was not known by anybody. Let us seek refuge to Allah, the Almighty God. So, what it means? Muslims those who died during this period of time were not actual Muslims? Because they did not know the actual concept of these four terms according to Maududi. It is the grace of Allah that Maududi had born only 20th century otherwise he would have converted many salafees (?) to Maududi's Islam i.e. Jamaat'e Islami.
My dear brother there is big conspiracies have been going on against the Salafi movement in all over the world. So please don’t be a part of it. The recent split in the salafi movement in Kerala is a best example for this kind. Judge yourself before you being judged. May Allah include us among the blessed people and help us to remove our predominant and prejudiced attitude towards understanding the true Islam and fellow Muslims.
With prayers for the peaceful life here and in the here after
Affectionately yours,
Mammedutty Nilambur

Muslims, Democracy and the Manhaju Salaf

Assalamu alaikum warahmathullah,
Sub: Muslims, Democracy and the Manhaju Salaf
Alhamdulillah I am keeping fine but my only major concern at present is your perception and understanding of Islam. Firstly I would like to make it clear that Deen and Duniyya should be considered as two connotations. But what I feel that often you mixing these two terms together to understand and explain Islam like our contemporary Ihwanees do. I presume that I have clearly distinguished between these two aspects in my previous mail ‘organised Da’wa against organizations’
Muslims should have moderate views and stand in religious matters and political as well. So Muslims should avoid favouring immoderate uncompromising policies while living in any society. There is no harm for a Muslim to live in a country where his/her beliefs and practices are not interrupted by the authority or people. Based on this principle, a country can be classified as:-
1) A country ruled according to Sharia laws and so, Muslims do not have any problem to practice Islam.
2) A country ruled other than Sharia laws but Muslims are permitted to practice Islam as a basic right given by the constitution.
3) A country does not allow Muslims to stay and practice Islam.
The Holy Qur'an and the Sunna of prophet (peace be upon him) do not discourage Muslims either live or cooperate with the above first two countries. But the country mentioned as third, where Muslims are not allowed to live, Allah permitted Muslims to dissent with them. (And Allah said "Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought not against you on account of religion and did not drive you out of your homes. Verily Allah loves those who deal with equity." [60:8])
As I mentioned above, a country ruled according to Sharia i.e. Islamic state, would not be a state of absolute democracy nor theocracy or dictatorship or kingdom instead a combination of the first two. Those who are giving verdict against voting, participating in election, organization and collective strive in da'wa often conveniently ignoring the real concept of Islamic state.
Muslims in all over the world do not differ regarding the importance of implementing Islamic law and jurisprudence as a governing system for Muslims. But they mainly differ on how, when and where it is to be implemented. Prophet Salallahu walaikwasalam lived in a place where a taghut system was existed. He never fought against Quaraysh to remove the existing system in Makah instead primarily he tried to purify the people from ascribing partners to Allah. When the Quaraysh told prophet (peace be upon him); you have brought to your people a matter of worry, you have declared their way of life to be foolish, you have insulted their gods. If what you want is money, we will put together a fortune for you, so that you may be richest of us; if you want honour we will make you our chief, if you want power, we will make you king. Prophet (peace be upon him) replied to them; "I swear by Allah if they put the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left on condition that I give up my work, I would not abandon it until it becomes victories or I lose my life in its course". If the intention of prophet Salallahu alaihiwasallam was to establish a kingdom of Allah/ Islamic state he would have accepted the offers of Quaraysh. It shows that establishing Kingdom of Allah in the world is not as important while comparing to inviting people to the fundamental principles of Islam i.e. no one worthy to be worshiped but Allah alone.
Democracy; a lethal weapon of the common peopleYou have quoted the Ayat 40 from Surat Yusuf, Inal Hukum ila Lilah {The command (or the judgement) is for none but Allah- (translated by Mohsin khan)} to prove your claim that democracy is a major Shirk? Mahadallah. I really scared that It is the same repetition of the people who had uttered this verse to declare Ali (may Allah pleased with him) as Kafir (disbeliever) when he was decided for arbitration in accordance with the Qur’an to Muāwiyah (may Allah pleased with him) in the Battle of Siffin. It is not the methodology of Salaf but it was the methodology of the deviants- Khawarij. But in contrary to the fact that you people are accusing KNM do not having Manhaju Salaf and the same time claiming that you people are the real bearers of the manhaju salaf??!!!
If every system of ruling other than Islamic principles is a Shirk then Prophet Salallahu alaihiwasallam would not have sent his companions to Ethiopia where un-Islamic system of ruling was existed and more over Prophet Yoosuf alaisalaam was a Minister of a non Muslim ruler, king Walid bin Rayyan. Prophet Salallahu alaihiwasallam never taught his companions that democracy, secularism etc are shirk. He used to take decision in worldly matters after consulting with his companions. Even the selection procedure of Khalifa was also settled after the consensus of the people of Sahaba.
A country like India where 80% of the people are not Muslims and among the existing Muslims majority of them are grave worshippers, calling upon dead people etc. According to a recent study about the living standard of Indian Muslims, reveals that they are the most backward class among the people of India in general, than backward socio-economic class of Hindus. Being a democratic country, political power and the ruling of the central to the lowest level will be decided the developments of every sphere of life of people in educationally, socially, economically etc.
If you are looking to the Kerala state, you can see that Muslims in Kerala is far better than Muslims in other state of India. The reason is, without any doubt, can say that Muslims in Kerala have well “organized” in politically and religiously and hence, able to do negotiation for the betterment of the community.
If 51 % of the people demand for the Sharia law and the Islamic system of Govt; in India we can think about that. In a democratic system ‘VOTING’ is considered as the lethal weapon of the common people. So express your preference for a candidate or resolution; cast a vote and decide the future of Muslims in India and defend the fascist from ruling the country.
Salafism Vs Utopian Salafism
You have stated in your mail as “people cannot have a system where the majority decides what is halaal and what is haraam. This is shirk or taghut, where people rely on majority and not the deen or Allah's laws and proofs”.
Dear brother beyond any doubt we can say that it is a utopian concept characterized by impracticable perfection and believes in the ultimate perfectibility of man. In the democratic system, majority have no provision to decide a halaal as haraam in deen and vice versa. You have seriously mistaken about this two aspects.
There is no question of majority or minority in case of determining halaal and haram in Deen. If the minority or even a particular individual has decided to change a haraam as halaal in deen it is unlawful in Islam and vice versa. For example people of either majority or minority or the whole nation decided to worship Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him), beyond doubt it is a Shirk in Islam as well as very few people or a particular person has decided to worship Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him) also will be considered as Shirk in Islam. Is it not childish to blame only the majority?
But, in case of Dunniya or the worldly matters majority have the right to decide traffic rules, foreign policy, construction of express highway, income tax and custom tax rate etc and it will not call as shirk. I do not know how can a Salafi methodology follower like you, from Zubair Mankada group, a rigidly accurate; allowing no deviation from the standard of Manhaju Salaf (?), and considering other salafees in Kerala are in Bidha and hence calling them Hizbi, Mubtati etc understood Islamic Monotheism/ Thauhid in a vague perspective similar to Jamaat e Islami and Ihwanees?!! Apart from this it will not come under the classification of Thauhid (Islamic Monotheism) according to the perspective of Ahlu sunna wa Jammah.
What is Thauhid?
Thauhid has three aspects as follows:-
Oneness of the Lordship of Allah: (Tawheed-ar-Ruboobeeyah) To believe that there is only one Lord for all the universe, Who is its Creator, Organizer, Planner, Sustainer, and Giver of security.
Oneness of the Worship of Allah: (Tawheed-al-Ulooheeyah or Tawheed-al-Ebaadah) To believe that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah.
Oneness of the Names and Qualities of Allah:(Tawheed-al-Asma-Sifaat)
One may not name or qualify Allah except with what He or Prophet Muhammad salallahu walaiwasalam had named or qualified Him, and that nobody else can be named or qualified with those names and qualities.
According to the salafi Creed and Methodology (Aqeeda and Manhaj) Thauhid has only three aspects as I have given above. But based on your above statement on Shirk we have to add one more aspect in Thauhid i.e. none other than Tawheed-ul-Haakimiyyah. Now see what scholars say about this:-
1. Shaykh Naasir al-'Umar says:
"They think that tawheed is only singling out Allah in Kingship and the obligation of making the Rule for Him Alone.
2. Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-'Uthaymeen says
"Verily the one who calls to that is an innovator. Indeed this is an innovated categorization, emanating from an ignoramus who does not understand anything from the matters of Creed and Religion."
3. Shaykh Muhammad Naasirud-Deen al-Albaanee said to the proponents of this demented concept:
"So you use this term (al-haakimiyyah) to wage war upon those whom you suspect to be disbelievers from amongst the rulers because they do not rule by Islaamic Law. So you have forgotten yourselves, this haakimiyyah covers every Muslim."
In short according to the Salafi creed and methodology if any one who believes that there is a fourth category of Tawheed-ul-Haakimiyyah then he is an innovator. During the last 50 years, jamaat e Islami have been propagating this innovated demented concept of ‘Ina Hukumu ila lilahi’ as Thauhid in the name of Islam in India and elsewhere for the intention of establishing an Islamic state and accusing the Indian Muslims they are committing political Shirk by abiding the laws made by other than Allah. But they could not bring forth any impact on Indian Muslims as Muslims realized that democracy and secularism is not a matter of concern if it will provide Muslims in India complete freedom to believe and practice Islam and moreover can invite people to Islam. Salafi movement in India and outside as well strongly opposed the growth of this Kawarij ideology of Hakkimiyya. But unfortunately nowadays some of the so called self proclaimed salafees in all over the world are propagating Ihwanism as salafism to mislead the youths from the path of pious predecessors. Their enmity is so severe towards their brothers in Islam who have been conveying the true message of Islam than who are presenting Islam with distorted nature. So my dear brother just ameliorates to spread true message of Islam and cooperate with others who are inviting people to Thouhid and Sunna and avoid every sort of rebellion approaches to your brothers in Islam as The Prophet said (s.a.w.): "None of you will have faith till he likes for his (Muslim) brother what he likes for himself" (Bukhari), and by Wisdom of the Almighty: "The believers are nothing else than brothers (in Islamic religion)" (49:10)..
I Hope that you may persuaded the facts. May Allah strengthen us with wisdom, useful knowledge, modesty and foster compassion towards fellow Muslims.

Please visit me@http://abuhaniyya.blogspot.com

The real enemies of Islam

The real enemies of Islam
People those who are against Islam always trying to tarnish and corrupt religion both within the community as well as outside the community. But generally they are appearing with a different interpretation and approach to the Quran and Sunna. They used to appear among the Muslims as a source of unity, social service etc for the enrichment of the community. They always so bigmouthed about the importance of unity of Muslims, welfare of Muslims, education of Muslims, political power of Muslims etc rather than unifying the Muslims through the principles, beliefs and practices based on Quran and Sunna. Apparently, this sort of people are not really working in the course of Allah but helping enemies to malign Islam. Islam is calumniated in its true beliefs and practices by such people. They are like the one who are trying to construct building without foundation and hence, leaving the Muslims as leather floating in the water. The most pertinent and the same time most disturbing aspect of this people is that they are so arrogant towards the Muslims, who are trying to follow strictly Quran and Sunna, than Idolaters, Atheist, pagans etc.
It is the agenda of enemies of Islam to disturb the propagation of Islam, Da'wa. They used to adopt many methods to stop the primary duty of a Muslim i.e. conveying the message of true Islam to people. It may be plotted by creating an atmosphere of arrogance and misunderstanding between people or discouraging Muslims as saying that the whole sale knowledge is only available in such and such scholars, students of knowledge etc. This sort of acts only will help the enemies instead of getting a helping hand for Muslims in the path of propagation of Islam. Mutual understanding and cooperation between the God fearing Muslims in a society is very much essential for propagation work but creating confusion, chaos in the name of manhaju salaf (?) these fraudulent salafees are preventing Muslims to strive in the course of Allah.
These so called anti hizbees (?) are enjoying in slandering on Muslims who invites the people to Islam and defend the attack of enemies. They seem to be specialized only in how to destruct the organized Da’wah of Muslims rather defending Islam from the attacks of enemies, innovators etc.
Allah says in Quran, In Soorah Aal'imraan 3:110 "you are the best nation raised up among mankind (because) you command the good and prohibit the evil” Commanding the good is not sufficient in itself to earn us the title "best of the nations" it must be complemented by the prohibitions of evil. Purifying the Religion of Allah and defending it from the attacks is a collective obligation of all pious and God fearing Muslims, if Allah did not bring up some people to oppose the enemies, innovators and then the religion would suffer harm, corruption and deviation. Allah knows better.
What is to be done by Muslims in this juncture? Of course they should avoid all kinds of biasness to any particular organization or a ‘group of people’ (who claim to be even anti group) but we should well aware that we believe in the true Islam. It is very clear from the Quran that there are two groups in the world, one is the group of Allah and other is the group of Shaytâan (devils). The Quran says:-
Al-A'raf - 7:30
A group He has guided, and a group deserved to be in error; (because) surely they took the Shayâtin (devils) as Auliyâ' (protectors and helpers) instead of Allâh, and consider that they are guided. (Al-A'raf 7:30)
May Allah strengthen us with wisdom and modesty and shows us the straight path.
Mammedutty Nilambur

Troid.org exposed

Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullah,

Sub:Troid.org exposed
As far as my knowledge is concern either salafitalk.net or troid.org is not based on manhaju salaf since they are propagating the ideology of Hakimiyya in the banner of salafi creed. For example we can see that democracy as a Shirk by misquoting the Ayat 40 from Surat Yusuf, Ina hukumu ilalillahi, as our Ihwanee leaders have been given the same to declare democracy as shirk, voting as shirk, elections are shirk/Bidha etc. The same old Ihwanee ideology presented here but in the name of Salafi creed. The troid.org has gone farther as defining democracy as worshipping of the majority, I seek refuge with Allah.
Our beloved Prophet Mohammed salallahu alayhiwasalam explained Ibaadah as; 'Adua hu wal Ibaadah' (sorry if misspell).It means Ibaadah is “the Prayer”. So what ever good deeds you do (with Itibaah) for Allah with a prayer/ dua it is an Ibaadah/ worship to Allah in Islam. If there is no dua it will not be considered as Ibaadah/ worship. That is why if a person asks help to a dead one or a deity other than Allah is called Shirk in Islam. Because, his dua has directed to that dead one who does not know the unseen. But Allah only knows that. So he is ascribing partners with Allah in worship. If you obey the rules made by a Kafir govt it will not consider as Ibadaah because there is no dua in your obedience. This is the major difference between Muslims and Jamaat e Islami, Ihwanee followers. They believe that if a Muslim obeys the rules made by a system of un-Islamic govt it is an ibaadah to that govt. because of this misinterpretation they believe to be living in India and elsewhere as Mushriks. But Muslims in India and elsewhere believe that until and unless there is no dua in obedience, obeying the rules of a kaafir Govt will not be considered as Ibaadah and hence it is not a Shirk.
Now see the definition the author has given for democracy in the so called Salafi site www.troid.org, democracy means ‘the worshipping of the majority’. (Shaykh 'Abdul-'Azeez brings forth a multitude of clear proofs opposing the 'way of life' known as democracy (the worshipping of the majority!). Now you decide whether there is any dua in democracy as this Shaykh has given. Have you believe that people are worshipping the majority in democracy? Then, where is Dua in this phenomenon? Now it is clear these people are not Salafi but they are the real Bidhahees. May Allah save the Muslim community from the fitna of these people.
My dear brothers and sisters in Islam please make sure a website by its creed and methodology instead of its name. These people are fraudulent and counterfeit Salafees to create misunderstanding among the people about Salafiya
And say: "Truth has come and falsehood has vanished. Surely! Falsehood is ever bound to vanish." (Al-Isra 17:81)
Mammedutty Nilambur

Organised Da'wa against organisations!!

Assalamu alaikum warahmathullah,
Sub: Organised Da'wa against organisations!!
Islam, the religion of Allah has been completed with Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him). There is nothing should be added as Deen after him. But the same time Allah didn't say that Duniyya or the worldly matters also completed along with Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him). That’s why we Muslims actively engaged in different walks of life and enjoying many things which prophet (peace be upon him) or his companions didn't have in their life time. If Duniyya also was completed with prophet (peace be upon him) we Muslims could not cope up with the changes of the society in matters of worldly things. Alhamdulillah, Allah has given freedom for His slaves to strive and achieve the best for the goodness of the humanity as a whole without ignoring the principles of Islam. Alahamdulillah, Allah has perfected His religion forever through His last and final messenger for the salvation of humanity. If something added new in this regard it is considered as a Bidha or innovation in Islam. That is why, birthday of prophet (peace be upon him) considered as innovation in Islam by God fearing Muslims.
If you are looking to the history of deviants and innovators in Islam you can see that they all appeared with a new interpretation of Qur'an and Sunna. The enemies of Islam understood that it is easy to malign or destruct Islam by working within instead of outside.
When there was a dispute and differences of opinion among the earliest Muslims, Sahaba, 'the Khawarij' appeared with a new interpretation of Qur'an within them. In the modern era also was witnessed the same methodology of Khawareej to create ftna among the Muslims as different forms. When there were chaoses among Indian Muslims in the beginning of 20th century as they fought against British rule in India along with Hindus, odd voices had risen, as old wine but in new bottle, like Khawareej. They declared the freedom fighting of Indian Muslims as unlawful and even voting as shirk, institutions are Taghoot, elections were unislamic etc. Alhamdulillah, Muslims in India didn't regard such unworthy fatwa and ideology and they actively participated in every development of secular India and try to enlighten the Muslims as socially, religiously, economically, educationally etc.
There are many organisations formed to the welfare of Indian Muslims as religiously as well as politically. But many of them did not make any impact on Muslims due to their unpractical ideology which is absolutely contrary to Qur'an and Sunna.
In my recent visit to one of the so called salafi sites (www.salafitalk.net), I found that a Sheik from Saudi Arabia repeating the same fatwa like the Jamaat e Islami have done on Indian Muslims against participating elections, voting etc. He may not be aware about Indian constitutions or individual rights of Muslims as an Indian citizen.
Those who are against organised Da'wa or organisations, criticising mainly the KNM. In a site www.salafitalk.net, Zubair Muhammad (well known as Zubair Mankkada) pointing out as Sharia violation of KNM as follows
1. Mixed education in their schools and colleges in different levels, employing female managers and teachers without proper hijab in their institutions
The above questioner also presently working as a teacher in a Govt' School in Kerala and all Govt' Schools in Kerala having mixed sex education system and more over he has to work with female Heads and other female colleagues. So far Moulavi Zubair doesn’t quit his job?
2. Those who declared organisation as a Bidha and working against organisation also was a graduate from such Bidhahee institutions and more over still earning livelihood from such job. What should we, Muslims call such things in Islam? Is it not PARADOX?
Let me conclude for the time being as, it is not mandatory for any Muslims to join in organisations but it is mandatory for every Muslim to have certain qualities before pointing others mistakes (?)
May Allah save the Muslim community from the Fitna of both learned and unlearned people and forgive our mistakes and shows us the straight path
With prayers for the peaceful life here and in the hereafter
Mammedutty Nilambur